Prev3 of 5Next

Installation and Test Notes

While we normally like to set up a test system similar to what Intel’s own engineers sampled, we simply don’t have any Intel SSDs. Instead we went with the best components on hand provided by various vendors who make any computing experience that much greater.

Here are the specs for our test system:

The latest motherboard Inf 9.1.1.1015 Chipset and nVidia 190.62 graphics drivers were installed as well as the most up to date Windows 7 build possible since it has been “optimally tuned” for it.

SANDRA, Cinebench 10, Futuremark Vantage, Crysis, World at War, Left 4 Dead, and Mirror’s Edge were used for testing. Many of these you’ll be able to find free and be able to replicate or compare your own system’s results.

Lynnfield Synthetic Benchmark Performance

Even though SANDRA isn’t completely Windows 7 ready, I found the program good for answering two important questions in regards to CPU performance and memory bandwidth.

SANDRA Mathemetical and Multi-Media

Lynnfield_Performance_Graph_08

As you can see, the CPU is anything but weak when it comes to Multimedia and Arithmetic calculations. The 870 and 750 both do surprisingly well in comparison to their equal counter parts given each is only using dual channel memory.

SANDRA Memory Bandwidth

Lynnfield_Performance_Graph_07

Speaking of dual channel, we wanted to see just how the Lynnfield’s integrated memory controller measures up to the Bloomfield’s. It’s not surprising to see triple channel out pace dual channel memory. You’ll notice that the gap is fairly close.

Cinebench R10

Cinebench does a great basic job of offering the test systems’ overall performance. But, it’s especially detailed if you’d like to compare processing power from CPU to CPU.

Lynnfield_Performance_Graph_02

In single threaded (single core) mode, the 870 enjoys a nice little gain over its Extreme siblings. This is indeed a unusual surprise and further testament to Lynnfield. However, the tables turn in favor of the Extreme processors mainly due to their extra memory channel.

Futuremark Vantage

We know that Vantage isn’t completely optimized for Windows 7 quite yet. But, it’s really close to being perfected and it works on any current version of Windows. We figured why not give it a shot and see what develops.

Lynnfield_Performance_Graph_01

Judging by the scores, both processors were successful. In fact, these scores look pretty darn respectable and most likely won’t change even with any Futuremark updates. The i5 750’s performance is worth noting given that it has a lower core frequency and keeps up with the faster, more expensive Q9650.

Prev3 of 5Next

Share This With The World!